Everything You Wanted To Know About Imad Mugniyah (And Were Too Afraid To Ask)
Okay, not everything you wanted to know about Mugniyah, which would undoubtedly include more facts about his role in Hezbollah and international terrorism, and the identity of his assassins. Nevertheless, there have been some pretty good analyses of Mugniyah in the international press recently:
- Martin Kramer points out that Hezbollah's posthumous embrace of Mugniyah is an embarassment to scholars who bought Hezbollah's company line, during the past two decades, that they had no idea who Mugniyah was.
"One of [Hezbollah's] paramount interests is concealing from scrutiny that apparatus of terror that Mughniyah spent his life building. Hiding the clandestine branch protects it from Hezbollah's enemies, and makes it easier to sell the movement to useful idiots in the West, who insist that the movement hasn't done any terror in years, and maybe never did any at all," writes Kramer.
- Nicholas Blanford floats the idea that Syria was behind Mugniyah's assassination, as part of some broader deal with the Americans involving the international tribunal. He gets Walid Jumblatt's tentative support for the idea: "It could have been the Syrians," he said. "Damascus is well protected, and I don't think somebody else could do it." I mean, come on.
- Andrew Exum begins a long, informative thread where he and commentators including Michael Young, David Schenker, and Lee Smith bat around ideas regarding who could have killed Mugniyah. The general consensus seems to be that Syria is not in the business of giving high-profile gifts to the West, and especially ones that are irrevocable. Furthermore, the fact that Mugniyah was killed in the middle of Damascus is an embarassment to the Syrian regime -- if they wanted him dead, they would have killed him elsewhere. "Occam's Razor seems to apply here: Given what we know now, the simplest answer is probably the correct one," writes Exum. And that, of course, is Mossad.
- The LA Times compiled a list of Mugniyah's alleged "greatest hits" (excuse the pun). Ex-CIA officer Robert Baer and Magnus Ranstorp, who wrote a Hezbollah primer, seem to be the go-to guys in the press for commentary on Mugniyah. Quoth Ranstorp: "Certainly within the U.S. intelligence community, some were as eager to get Imad Mughniyah as they were Bin Laden...I'm sure there will be champagne corks popping [in Washington]"

Comments (4)
My favorite is the one I heard from an "Ex-CIA operative who tracked Moughnieh" who told the BBC:
"I wouldn't be surprised if the Lebanese Sunni or Christian factions commissioned his killing"
Now that's rich!
Posted by Mustapha Hamoui | February 16, 2008 6:21 PM
Posted on February 16, 2008 18:21
My favorite is the one I heard from an "Ex-CIA operative who tracked Moughnieh" who told the BBC:
"I wouldn't be surprised if the Lebanese Sunni or Christian factions commissioned his killing"
Now that's rich!
Posted by Mustapha Hamoui | February 16, 2008 6:22 PM
Posted on February 16, 2008 18:22
My favorite, so far:
The syrians did, but not a kill - just a big stage act. Mugniyah isn't dead, just "below the radar", and case west didn't bargain over the tribunal (and Lebanon), we'll have another lazarus.
:)
Posted by perspication | February 17, 2008 1:55 PM
Posted on February 17, 2008 13:55
The main thing I need to remember with regards to Imad, is that he started his career as a sniper for the PLO in 1976 killing Lebanese; the rest does not come as a surprise.
The world is better off with out him.
Posted by Marillionlb | February 18, 2008 4:23 PM
Posted on February 18, 2008 16:23