Mr. Nice Country
Less than two weeks ago -- though, given the recent pace of news, it seems like an eternity -- the United Nations Security Council passed Resolution 1757, to set up the international tribunal. The one dark spot on an otherwise wonderful day was the abstention of Qatar, the only Arab country with a Security Council vote.
Qatar's vote was strange on a few levels. The tiny emirate is considered a pro-Western, pro-Saudi country -- it houses America's largest military base in the Middle East, and maintains strong relations with its larger neighbor. It has also concerned itself with Lebanon in the past; Qatar gave $250 million to rebuild Bint Jbail, and its leader was the first Arab leader to visit Lebanon after last summer's war.
I spent a good part of last week learning about Qatar's foreign policy, and trying to put their vote into context of their larger goals. It was an interesting task, in the same way it would be interesting to study other historical oddities -- say, a dodo bird or a platypus. What I found was that, though Qatar works very hard to cultivate an image of being a modern, liberal country, at the end of the day they are primarily concerned with their petro-dollars. Here's a passage from my article:
"Before Qatar discovered that it was floating on a sea of oil, it was one of the poorest countries in the world. Now, it is one of the richest. As a tiny state, only slightly larger than Lebanon, Qatar does not dream of being a major regional power. Instead, it is primarily interested in sustaining its booming economy. To do so, it needs to keep the oil flowing, and maintain the broadest possible range of trade partners. The country's foreign policy can best be understood as a form of benevolent realpolitik -- essentially, the Qataris use their oil wealth to buy the goodwill of their neighbors. Any concern over the political alignment or long-term goals of other states is secondary."
Anyway, read the whole thing. I wrote this for Now Lebanon magazine, where I will be working full time for the next few months, at least. It's a great new resource for people interested in politics and culture in Lebanon, and I expect that it is going to be very popular.

Comments (3)
* When their emir came to Beirut, it was via Tel Aviv.
* Their gas reserves are more important to them than oil.
* They are far from being a liberal, western-leaning country. On the contrary. Their advertising is misleading.
* They have shitty relations with Saudi. The vote at the UNSC was a slap to their neighbors faces (I say it in plural because it was also aimed at the UAE and Kuwait - staunch supporters of the Lebanese project).
Posted by The Perpetual Refugee | June 9, 2007 3:21 PM
Posted on June 9, 2007 15:21
I've read your piece, and find it very enlightening. But Qatar's hypocrisy may not work in this more open age, as Perpetual Refugee points out above.
The main limit to their approach is their size; Qatar is a small country that cannot escape its local environment, and that needs either Saudi or Iran to secure its export. At Qatar has far more at stake in Lebanon than in Syria, their planned investment in refining in Zahrani up to 2 Billion $, may be endangered. After all, the need for refining capacity and outlets is such that we can easily find other partners for this project; already the Saudis (who still own the TAPLINE) and the British (who need a lot of gas) are making overtures.
The Qataris need to keep in mind that the Lebanese are businessmen too, and they've been doing this wheeling and dealing for far longer. And we have learned to diversify away from a single source, and not to let too many investors in by way of Syria.
Posted by Jeha | June 10, 2007 8:28 AM
Posted on June 10, 2007 08:28
Hey guys, thanks for the comments.
Refugee, thanks for the information regarding the Emir's flight through Tel Aviv, and the distinction between gas and oil. I'm embarassed to admit that I was sufficiently ignorant of the business to appreciate the difference.
Jeha, I hope you're right. The Zahrani story is a good one to keep an eye on. But, as I said in my piece, I'm skeptical any lasting damage has been done. It does show that Qatar's marriage to the West and Saudi is more one of convenience than principle, so a bigger split is possible if the balance of power shifts.
Posted by David Kenner | June 10, 2007 1:03 PM
Posted on June 10, 2007 13:03